German Tuner Wraps And Punches Up Performance Of Mercedes-Benz CL500

A fairly new tuning company from Germany called WRAPworks has presented a fresh take on the pre-facelift W216 Mercedes-Benz CL500.[...]

Past Masters: Andrew Frankel Revisits The 1992 Jaguar XJ220 Supercar

In 1988, Jaguar unveiled a new concept at the NEC Auto Show in Birmingham. It was a study for a lightweight, mid-engined supercar to compete against the Ferrari F40 and the Porsche 959[...]

Watch Our 12 Most Popular Offbeat Videos Of 2012

When we're not scooping out future cars or reporting the news from around the auto industry, we habitually like to snoop around and see what else is going on in the world of four and sometimes, two wheels - guilty as charged[...]

Watch A Tug Of War Between A VW Touareg V10 TDI And A Chevrolet Silverado Duramax V8

It seems that pickup truck owners throughout the country have a thing for competing in amateur pulling contests[...]

750HP Aston Martin Vs 626HP Mercedes SLR McLaren Vs 560HP Nissan GT-R

Here's further proof that horsepower numbers can be hugely deceiving. A completely stock Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren with 626-ponies goes up against a lightly tuned Nissan GT-R with a Stage 2 kit and[...]

Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts

Thursday, April 12, 2012

2012 Kia Forte 5-Door Hatchback Review

2012-Kia-Forte-5-Door-Hatchback-Feature-0410_rdax_646x396

The Forte was Kia’s first shot at redemption. Replacing the simple Spectra with something more dramatic wouldn’t be difficult, especially since it would be then-new head designer Peter Schreyer’s first kick at establishing the company’s new styling direction. Although it borrowed many cues from its Honda Civic rival, the Forte sedan and two-door Koup were distinctive enough to quiet most of the complainers. Looking to add some utility to the model range, a five-door Forte was quickly added, making it one of the few hatchbacks in the segment.
FAST FACTS
1. 
Cargo room behind the rear seat is rated at 19.4 cu-ft.
2. Just two trims are offered, an EX with a 156 hp 2.0L 4-cylinder and the SX with a 173 hp 2.4L.
3. EX models start at $18,100 with the SX at $19,600.
Besides the obvious addition behind the C-pillar, the Forte5 gets some unique detailing to differentiate itself from the more sedate sedan. It’s slightly more aggressive and sits lower on its wheels thanks to more athletically oriented suspension tuning on every model. There’s more than a hint of Mazda3 Sport in the side-view, while the rear end isn’t terribly unique; features like the ubiquitous faux air diffuser, sharp taillights and a five-sided rear window are seen on plenty of its rivals. Overall, it’s a pleasant package and those cues blend well with the aggressive ‘dip’ in the front window line.

NO SUCH THING AS A BASE MODEL

2012-Kia-Forte-5-Door-Hatchback-steering-wheel
Since the five-door isn’t available in entry-level LX trim, our no-option EX tester is as ‘base’ as they come... And it certainly doesn’t feel like a penalty box thanks to a six-speaker audio system with USB input, Bluetooth hands-free, air conditioning, plus power locks, windows and mirrors. Although a few years old now, the design still looks clean and inviting.

The Forte 5-door offers nearly 20 cu-ft of cargo space with the seats up; not a huge amount more than the sedan. But of course, dropping the rear 60/40-split bench expands that amount dramatically. And the utility of a hatch is being able to stuff tall and awkwardly shaped items in without too much stress. It also has the increased benefit of making child-seats easier to install too since the top-strap can loop over the folding seat-back rather than being jammed up on a rear-parcel shelf in the sedan.

2012-Kia-Forte-5-Door-Hatchback-back-seat

TWO ENGINE OPTIONS

2012-Kia-Forte-5-Door-Hatchback-engine
Our tester was easy to get around town thanks to the 156-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, which worked quite well with the standard six-speed automatic transmission since there are only 2,840 lbs to move around. Kia estimates the Forte 5-door consumes 26 mpg in town and 36 mpg on the highway, which seems a tad optimistic, but we didn’t notice anything outrageous in our week with one.

Upgrading to the top-end SX model brings a 173-horse 2.4-litre four, but neither engine inspires any sense of passion. Don’t forget that these are the ‘old’ Kia engines, not the direct-injection units found in the Soul and Rio that produce more grunt and consume less gas in the process.

As mentioned earlier, Kia’s five-doors are aimed at a more enthusiastic driver, although the 16-inch wheels and 205/55R16 all-season tires are shared with the sedan. The Forte hatch does have a slightly firmer ride, a hint of more responsive steering, and more roll control in the corners.

KIA PRICING, BUT WITH SOME TRICKS

At $18,100, the EX isn’t a bad deal at all... only two real options are available: a technology package with navigation, a rear-view camera, push-button start, automatic climate control and some chromed niceties outside for $1,800 plus there’s a power sunroof for $750. For comparison sake, the SX is $19,600 with 17-inch wheels, the bigger 2.4-litre engine and not much else. Its option packages mimic the EX, although you can also order leather-covered seats for an extra grand.

2012-Kia-Forte-5-Door-Hatchback-road

Here Kia should be raked over the coals a little: If you order the SX Tech package, you are required to order the leather seats and sunroof for a total hit of $2,500. Not nice. You can, however, order the leather or sunroof alone without triggering the trap...

THE VERDICT

The Kia’s biggest rival, the Mazda3 i Touring, runs about $20K with its new Skyactiv engine and automatic transmission, while the Ford Focus SE is $19,500, but still comes with plastic wheel-covers and costs over $20,000 to get close to the Forte 5-door. Ditto the Volkswagen Golf.

2012-Kia-Forte-5-Door-Hatchback-back

We won’t even bring up the Toyota Matrix (too slow) or Scion xB (too soft) or current Elantra Touring, which is already set to be replaced by the new Elantra GT.

Until then, the Forte 5-door certainly warrants a test drive. Even in its most basic form, it’s a fun, good-looking hauler that should be popular with younger buyers. Perhaps a little less engaging that its rivals, this hatchback is strong on value.


LOVE IT
  • Sportier handling than sedan
  • Stylish interior
  • Hatch brings added flexibility for cargo
LEAVE IT
  • Uninspiring engine
  • No manual transmission available on five-door
  • Anonymous rear styling

By Unknown with No comments

Sunday, April 8, 2012

2013 Ford Mustang GT Review

2013-Ford-Mustang-GT-Review

Back in the ‘60s, Ford engineers and designers came up with a novel idea: taking the mechanical bits of the North American spec Ford Falcon and giving it some stylish new clothes. What they gave birth to was the 1964.5 Ford Mustang, and it proved to be a hit. In the first 18 months of production, Ford sold its millionth Mustang, a record that has yet to be broken by any sports car.

FAST FACTS

1. For 2013 the 5.0L V8 GT model now makes 420-hp at 6500 rpm and 390 lb-ft of torque at 4250 rpm, using premium fuel.
2. Ford's new "Track Apps" lets you measure your own 0-60 mph and 1/4 mile times, G-forces and braking distances.
3. For 2013, V6 models start at slightly less than last year, retailing for $22,200. V8 models, however, now top $30K at $30,300.
Nowadays, records are set on social media sites, where Ford continues to dominate, with the Mustang being the most popular sports car on Facebook with over 3.6-million “Likes.”

For 2013, much like every other year it seems, Ford is offering its customers a revised Mustang. Will this latest version recapture the sales glory of the original, or will it just be a social media darling? To find out, we traveled to Portland, Ore., to try the updated pony car.

REFRESHED LOOK, ONCE AGAIN

Changes are subtle from a visual perspective, but keen eyes will catch them quickly. For instance, there is a new grille and splitter at the front. There are new functional hood scoops on the GT model, while all versions benefit from body colored rocker panels. LED lights in the front and rear further update the exterior, while the space between the taillights is blacked out, to give the car a more sinister look. Other small changes improve down-force at higher speeds according to the Ford engineers.


All in, it looks better than ever, and you can choose to make yours stand out even more by picking from a list of 12 different alloy wheels, including three new designs for 2013.

SO MANY CHOICES

The choices don’t end there: as usual, both coupe and convertible body styles are available. There are also four engines to choose from. Along with high-performance the Boss 302 and Shelby GT500 there are the 3.7-liter V6 and the amazing 5.0-liter V8.

The same V6 engine remained for 2013. This naturally aspirated V6 still produces 305 hp at 6500 rpm and 280 lb-ft of torque at 4250 rpm. For 2013, the 5.0-liter V8 is a little bit stronger. The 5.0 V8 now makes 420-hp at 6500 rpm on premium fuel but drops to 402 hp on regular fuel. Torque is 390 lb-ft at 4250 rpm, again on premium fuel, with that figure dropping slightly to 377 lb-ft with regular gas.

With the engine, the body and the wheels selected, it’s time to choose between a six-speed manual gearbox, or a six-speed automatic with SelectShift. Many Mustang fans think of a V8 exhaust note as music, but if you prefer a different sound track you can choose between a 370-watt stereo and a 500-watt stereo system. New for this year, Ford decided to offer optional sports Recaro seats previously only available with the GT500 model.


The V6 model gets an optional ‘Performance Package’ which adds a strut tower brace, front and rear sway bars, unique front springs, plus stronger front and rear brake calipers with performance friction pads that can take more braking abuse. However, from the outside, the only clues that you’re driving a V6 Performance Pack Mustang is by sighting its unique 19-inch painted alloy wheels and gloss black side mirror caps.

‘TRACK APPS’ LET YOU MEASURE MUSTANG’S PERFORMANCE

The “Track Apps” were a particularly cool option available on all new Mustang models. Now you can record your 0-60 mph and 0-100 mph acceleration times. There’s also an available G-meter, and even means to record braking distances.

Being able to record driving data was fun, but the ‘Countdown Start,’ offered the most childish temptation. The 4.2-inch LCD display between the gauges shows a tree of lights familiar to anyone who has been to a drag strip. As the lights make their way down, launch the car when they turn green. Hilariously fun, yes, but it begs for bad behavior and speeding tickets.


Despite the near-excessive number of ways you can spec out the 2013 Ford Mustang, due to time constraints we only had time to test one Mustang during our drive program and we couldn’t resist the GT.

Our test car was an automatic, which was less than thrilling from a driving enthusiast perspective, but then again more people choose the automatic these days, for reasons we can’t fathom.

The new automatic has Ford’s SelectShift feature, which allows you to change gears as you wish. Unfortunately there isn’t even the illusion of a faux manual. No shifter feel, no parts moving to and froe.  Instead, you get a small button placed on the gear lever with a plus (+) and minus (-) mark. It was frustrating to use and totally unsatisfying.

Why didn’t Ford fit the Mustang with paddle shifters? We asked one of the Mustang’s engineers and he confessed that the shift times on this transmission are not the quickest and so Ford didn’t want to create any false impressions.

With the brand’s switch to dual-clutch gearboxes on its small cars, we also asked if Ford will ever offer a Mustang with a dual-clutch transmission. We didn’t get an answer but the Ford rep smiled silently after the question.

So for now, if you want an automatic Mustang, this is it. On the plus side, during normal use, it’s a smooth gearbox, and when using it in the sports mode, it remains in gear until you hit the upshift button, even if the engine is bouncing off the rev-limiter.

ON THE STREET

With a car capable of producing plenty of thrills, the weather did not cooperate. We suffered through rain during the entire drive. With a route along some very twisty, wet roads with no guardrails and steep drops (sometimes on both sides), its handling limits went untested.

Still, the Mustang impresses. Few would ever know this car still has a live-beam rear axle, its geometry so well developed, it will silence most critics. It’s competent and reassuring, even when covering ground quickly.


Traction and stability control systems help deliver a high-level of driving feel that still allows you to have some fun, and then gently reels you in, rather than kicking in too early and spoiling the thrill.

The Mustang has always been about fun, and we’re glad Ford engineers haven’t forgotten about that.

Nor did they forget about how important a good exhaust note is. The V8 Mustang always sounded good, but the 2013 is even better.

So is the new Mustang perfect? No, not quite. Despite the improvements, we still wish it had better brakes and a steering wheel that wasn’t lifted from the deck of a pirate ship, the interior is starting to feel pretty dated too.

THE VERDICT

If you’re tempted to buy one, the base V6 coupe is yours from $22,200. If you want a convertible, add $5,000 to that figure. The six-speed manual is standard, but the automatic is a $1,195 option.

If you prefer the roar of the 5.0-liter, V8 ‘GT’ model (we most certainly do), prices start at $30,300, which is a great value for the fun you can have with this car.



LOVE IT
  • New, improved styling
  • Track Apps
  • Brilliant sound track
  • Optional Recaros seats
LEAVE IT
  • Brakes need improvement
  • Steering wheel is too big
  • Dated interior
  • Terrible SelectShift button for automatic transmission

By Unknown with No comments

Friday, April 6, 2012

Nissan Juke-R Review [Video]

Nissan-Juke-R-Review

The next review of Nissan’s magical Juke-R concept comes from the guys at Autocar magazine. They get behind the wheel to see what this marriage between a run of the mill crossover and a world class sports car is holding up. The Juke-R is a stupid thing. It even looks like it, just look at that grin on its face. We have to say though, we absolutely love it.

The Juke-R project had no real purpose other than fun. They just wanted to see what happens if they put a GTR engine in the Juke. It’s fantastic.

Nissan Juke-R’s 485bhp 3.8-litre V6 twin turbo engine propels the car from a standing start to 100kph in just 3.7 seconds, before continuing on to a top speed of 257kph. Testing has proved that Nissan Juke-R enjoys supercar handling from a compact crossover, thanks to use of the Nissan GT-R’s suspension and drivetrain as well as an FIA-specification roll cage and unique split rear wing. In a straight line, the GT-R’s more aerodynamic shape ensures that its top speed is higher despite the same power plant being used in each. GT-R also remains lighter than Juke-R due to the roll cage and extra chassis reinforcement that has been required to place the supercar’s components into a Juke body.
videos

By Unknown with No comments

Caterham SP300.R Video Review

Caterham-SP300.R-Video-Review

With a Lola-developed chassis, 300bhp supercharged 2.0-litre Ford duratec engine and weight of just 545kg, the new £81k Caterham SP/300.R is a new breed of car for the British marque. Matt Prior tests it on track.

Source: Autocar
videos

By Unknown with No comments

2013 Acura RDX Review

2013-Acura-RDX

Turn the key in the ignition and the crude powerplant comes to life like the firewall has all the sound deadening of a cardboard box. It's engaging but rather unrefined for a luxury machine. It is, however, a hoot to drive with a sophisticated all-wheel drive system and plenty of thrust from its turbocharged engine.

FAST FACTS
 
1. All-new RDX trades its turbo 2.3L 4-cylinder for a more powerful, efficient and refined 3.5L V6..
2. Gone is SH-AWD in favor of a lighter, lower-tech solution.
3. Pricing starts at $34,320 for front-drive or $35,720 for AWD.
But this is not the 2013 Acura RDX. Rather, it's the car's predecessor, a 2012 model provided to journalists to gauge the level of improvement made to the all-new second generation compact luxury crossover during a launch event held in Scottsdale, AZ. A bold move by Acura, it's not unusual for an automaker to bring along a few competitive vehicles (in this case a BMW X3 and Audi Q5) to a drive event like this, but almost never is there a previous generation model, lest the improvements prove to be less than dramatic, or the previous generation car is better.

But "better" is a relative term. Acura targeted the first-generation at young urban males with a focus on performance and much less concern for fuel economy or ride quality - both of which the premium sport-cross lacked considerably. On sale for half a decade Acura's sales figures for the car reflect the fact that the folks in product planning got it all wrong. As a result, the RDX has done an about-face.

CAN COMPROMISE BE A GOOD THING?

Compromise may be valued in diplomacy, but in the auto industry it's a four-letter word. Still, every car is full of compromises, with success determined by a careful balance between opposing factors. The RDX is no different, although the creative minds at Acura prefer to replace "compromise" with what they call a "high contrast" philosophy.


Exactly what is being contrasted in the RDX? For starters there's the juxtaposition between fuel economy and performance, not to mention agile handling and ride quality, a dramatic design vs. a timeless one, and let's not forget compact size versus interior space - an area Honda brand vehicles (ZDX aside) always excel in.

Starting on the outside, the RDX, like all modern Acuras, has moved away from the brand's controversial styling cues of recent memory. Its lines are unlikely to wow anyone, just as they're also designed not to offend, with far too much CR-V in the window design. Larger than its predecessor, it's now much harder to distinguish it from the MDX. That perception of exterior size will, likely, help sell a few extra units. If the RDX does have a best angle, like much of the rest of the Acura lineup, it's from the rear.

The proportions are misleading, however, as the RDX is no wider than before, although its wheels have been brought out by roughly an inch side to side. Less of a handling gain, this helps deliver a more stable ride on the highway. With a new shock setup, further comfort gains are made by using slightly higher profile 235/60/18 tires.

It is an inch longer overall with an extra inch and a half between the wheels, although despite a more imposing presence on the road, it's actually a touch (5mm) lower overall. As a result, the center of gravity has been improved.

LUXURY RIDE

That should help improve the overall driving dynamics of the RDX, was it not now a much softer vehicle. That's not necessarily a criticism either. Sure it's no longer something we'd take on a canyon road, but it is vastly superior as a daily driven machine that will bring you to your destination in luxurious comfort. Compared to the BMW X3, the RDX soaks up bumps easily. Acura even designed to electric power steering specifically to offer less resistance at low speeds, acknowledging this as a preference for female drivers. In low speed driving around town or on the long sweeping highways running through Arizona's Tonto National Forest the new RDX makes the old one feel downright crude.


Another sign that Acura has tossed aside any sporting ambitions for its crossover is the removal of the brand's impressive Super Handling All-Wheel Drive system. A high-tech and heavy unit, it was axed in the name of cost and fuel economy. The "high contrast" factors being fuel economy versus performance. SH-AWD was a trend-setting technology, distributing power not just front-to-rear but up also side-to-side in the rear, allowing the car to essentially rotate on just one wheel. Perfect for serious performance, that's not what buyers want in this type of vehicle.

The new all-wheel drive system moves power front to rear with as much as 100 percent of the torque going through the front wheels for cruising, or a 50/50 split for under certain low traction circumstances.

Dropping SH-AWD has helped reduce the car's AWD weight by 100 lbs. That diet also helps in the fuel economy department, with the new RDX climbing in fuel economy by 5-mpg highway and 3-mpg combined for a total 19/27 or a combined 22 mpg rating. Front-drive models are also up to 20/28 and 23 mpg combined.

GOOD BYE TURBO, HELLO FUEL ECONOMY

Of course the biggest factor in improving fuel economy is the engine. While most automakers are trading six-cylinders for turbocharged 4-bangers, Acura is, oddly, doing the opposite. Apart from what are likely some financial constraints behind building an all-new engine for just one model, there's the fact that Acura's turbo 4 is the opposite of efficient - though it is incredibly fun

In its place now is a new 3.5-liter V6 making 273 hp and 251 lb-ft of torque. Acura boasts a 23 hp improvement, though doesn't like to mention it's also down 29 lb-ft of torque. Lacking in that turbo thrust, it's still more than enough power for a vehicle like this. No acceleration times have been announced but an engineer present at the launch did tell us it will do the sprint to 60 quicker than the old motor.

Helping make the engine so efficient is Honda's cylinder deactivation system that allows the V6 to run on four or even three cylinders when possible. The use of a 6-speed automatic over a 5-speed doesn't hurt either.

VASTLY IMPROVED AND WELL-EQUIPPED INTERIOR

Another of Acura's buzz phrases is a "man-machine synergy", which conjures up ideas of a well-balanced and intuitive sports sedan - something you won't feel when driving the RDX. Sitting behind the wheel, however, it's hard to deny the brand's "smart luxury" mantra with a handsome and modern interior, that's ergonomically sound and quieter than the X3. With standard leather, as well as heated front seats with a memory function the interior hits all the premium benchmarks. A sign of the car's change in identity, however, there's little in the way of side bolstering on the seats.

Other standard goodies include a moonroof, a multiview backup camera, Bluetooth, USB and iPod connectivity, a 360 watt audio system and perhaps best of all, the Keyless Access system with a push button ignition - a shiny red button too.

Keeping it simple, Acura offers front or all-wheel drive and the choice of a Tech Package on either, which adds a 410-watt 10 speaker audio system, HID headlights, a power tailgate, Acuralink traffic and weather updates plus a navigation system on a big and bright 8-inch monitor - not the old pixilated system used before.

As for functionality, the added space between the wheels translates into the best front and rear legroom and shoulder room in the segment. A wide rear opening allows access to the plentiful 26.1 cu-ft of rear cargo space, which expands to 61.3 cu-ft with the rear seats down.

A package to rival the best in the business, Acura sticks it to the Germans in the pricing department. Roughly $1,500 more than last year's model, the 2013 RDX starts at $34,320 or $35,720 for the all-wheel drive version. Models equipped with the tech-package are $38,020 (FWD) and $39,420 (AWD).

THE VERDICT
Acura discovered with the first-generation RDX that young males aren't buying these cars. Instead, couples are, both pre and post family. As a result, gone is the turbo and high-tech all-wheel drive. In essence, gone is the fun. In its place, however, the car has gained, well, more of everything else. It's lighter and more fuel-efficient. It's also significantly more refined. There's less of what people didn't really use and more of what they want.


With segment growth pegged at 12.6 percent through 2017, the RDX is poised to capture much more of that pie. A more mainstream option than in the past, about the only thing holding the RDX back is a more compelling design.

The folks at Acura can call it "high contrast" if they like; the RDX proves that as far a compact premium crossovers go, when it comes to the balance between performance and luxury, compromise isn't always a bad thing


LOVE IT
    Quiet, calm, smooth ride
    V6 delivers plenty of thrust
    Premium interior
    Attractive pricing
LEAVE IT
 Mediocre styling
 Much less fun

    By Unknown with No comments
    • Popular
    • Categories
    • Archives